Sortinghat

Run the firm on numbers, not on last month's report

Every recruiter's activity, every desk's margin, and a forecast you can plan headcount against.

Most staffing reporting was built to answer what happened last month, because that is what the accounts need. Those reports then get repurposed as management tools, which they were never designed to be. Revenue reporting and operating reporting are different jobs and should be different screens.

The numbers that move a week are leading ones: live submissions, interviews scheduled, offers in play, and receivables past 60 days. Fill rate and time-to-fill are quarterly quality signals and produce anxiety rather than decisions when checked daily.

Book a demo

Per recruiter, per desk

Activity and conversion per head, and where to coach. Activity metrics measure effort rather than output, so they are shown next to the conversion they are supposed to produce rather than on their own.

  • People and org planning. Revenue, bonus, salaries, team allocation and headcount in one view.
  • Permissions and access. Control who sees which desks, clients and conversations. The controls that stop two desks tripping over each other are the same ones that keep data where it belongs.
  • 1,200+ custom reports. Build the view your board asks for, then save it.

A forecast from live pipeline

Offers in play multiplied by your own historical offer-to-join rate, not an industry average, gives a revenue picture four to six weeks ahead of the P&L. That is a number you can plan headcount against.

Questions

Which staffing KPIs should an owner check daily?

Four: live submissions this week, interviews scheduled read as a ratio against submissions, offers in play, and receivables past 60 days. Each one moves before the outcome it predicts.

Why not run the week on fill rate and time-to-fill?

Both are useful and neither is actionable daily. Time-to-fill is measured from a start point you often do not control to an end point the client entirely controls. Fill rate moves on noise week to week because the denominator is small.

Are recruiter activity metrics worth measuring?

Only next to the conversion they are meant to produce. Rewarding activity on its own produces predictable dysfunction: more calls, more submissions, and no more placements.

How do permissions work across multiple desks?

Roles decide which desks, clients and conversations each person can open, which is the same mechanism that prevents two desks contacting the same candidate and the same mechanism that keeps client data compartmentalised.